Even pure bred racing cars were not exempt from this concept of "function following form" philosphy. The eventual all-conquering Ford GT40 left the Lola factory as a beautiful race car, perhaps the most visually stunning car of the era, yet was so poor aerodynamicly that the first shakedown runs were disasterous. It was only after serious aero and mechanical tweaking that the car was to become a winner.

Pure sports and racing cars of the 50's and 60's used fender vents to reduce the air pressure beneath the hood, thereby reducing lift. By giving the air that enters the engine compartment a controlled way out, the air doesn't have to force it's way out the bottom of the car, which lessens the high pressure air beneath the car. In many of todays race cars, this air is now redirected out of the hood thru the use of louvres, which is ok on a race car, but this practice (althougth there are cars that employ vents of this nature) is less practical on a street driven car where water can enter the engine compartment.

The front fender air extractor, is the vent is located in a depressed area of the housing, in kind of a backward scoop. This design takes advantage of the "Venturi" effect, using air flowing accross the air extractor to create a low pressure area, thereby drawing air out of the extractor. This results in something for nothing. High pressure air is given a pathway out of the engine compartment and at speed, a low drag port is molded into the side of the car which naturally aids in air removal.

Later, the Camaro Z28 would employ a similar fender air extractor, but this was done more to match the visual appeal of the Trans Am's air extractors.

1970-1973 - The original front spoiler was an integral part of the aero package of the Trans Am. The spoiler was about three-inches deep and was painted body color unlike the black spoiler of the original 1969 Trans Am. The spoiler ran full width and the ends flowed into the front wheel spats. The front spoiler added real aerodynamic downforce, again at a time in the auto industry was more interested in form over function. So natural and effective this spoiler was, it was used pretty much "as is" when raced in the S.C.C.A. Trans Am series, much unlike today's silhouette cars which run in the series.

1974-1975 - When it was time for the Trans Am to receive the Federaly mandated five mile-per-hour bumper impact standards, the front fascia of the T/A changed drasticly. The new front bumper requires a deeper front pan, so the front spoiler was reduced in depth to a little over an inch. While not as effective as the original, the new spoiler was a bit more more friendly to parking blocks and curbs than if it would have been deeper.

1976 - A new front end with a more integrated appearance debuted in 1976, and with it, yet another front spoiler. This spoiler wasn't much deeper than the '74-'75 version, and it seemed to be a bit more integrated. This spoiler was attached underneath the car behind a flexible, slotted pan. These spoilers mated up quite nicely to the spats, something that became increasingly less common when the pressure was on to increase the production numbers. This spoiler was used only for the 1976 model year so replacements are difficult to come by.

1977-1978 - A new nose piece combining the front bumper and the header panel into a single piece of urethane meant it was time for yet another front spoiler vairiation. This new spoiler was actually a combination of the front under pan and the spoiler. Made in an impact resistant plastic the pan used bolts and tabs extending from the pan to hold it into place. The spoiler portion extended barely over an inch deep and part of its duty was to force air into the vents on the front pan. The ends of the spoiler were intended to line up with the spats, but the results were often not quite as intended. The spoiler/pan was extremely vulnerable to cracking and breaking and it an regular sight to see a '77 or '78 running around "naked"; without the pan.

1979-1981 - The final version of the Trans Am front spoiler variation was one that was as much a styling element as it was an effectual component. The new nose was a "bottom breather", whereby part of the cooling air was taken below the car where the turbulent air normally lived, rather than disrupt the smooth airflow that passed over the front end by giving it an opening to glow into. The result was a spoiler that was much larger than the preceeding years. The new spoiler was made of a flexible material so it was much more resilient to life's everyday adventures. Because the new front spoiler was much larger and had a softer shape, new front wheel spats were required.

Which front spoiler had the greatest appeal? This is a tough one to call because they all had the same intent and thier design was ultimately determined by the front end style they were attached to.

Although the downforce generated is wonderful, if the engineers would have truely had their way the spoiler end caps would have taken on a different shape entirely. The designers made original caps come down to almost a point with a rounded top which actually spills air off the spoiler around the back of the car. Pontiac engineers wanted a spoiler that was more squared off and came down the sides straight, to give just that little bit more downforce. Sound familiar, because if you look at the Camaro rear spoiler, this is what Pontiac engineers had in mind.

When 1979 rolled around, the Trans Am got some softer shapes. The new nose was softened to break the wind better. The rear bumper was all new as was the entire rear end treatment except for the center section of the rear spoiler. What was new for the rear spoiler were the end caps. The end caps were much larger at the bottom, instead of coming down to a near point, the end caps had a horizontal detail line that met up with a vertical one that followed the leading edge of the end cap.

Opinions vary as to which rear spoiler looks the best. The original is tough to beat and did survive for nine years. But the rear spoiler that was used for the final three years was certainly more aggressive, despite being softened, so it to has its own appeal. Like the front spoiler, the rear spoiler is ultimately decided by the year of the car.

Wheel spats or wheel air deflectors, whichever name you wish to use, were another often imitated component of the Trans Am's aerodynamic package. The spats deflected air around the turbulence of the tires, cleaning up a bit of aero drag for a tradeoff of just a bit of frontal area. In the front, the spats were prone to bug strikes as well a the occasional stone from other vehicles. At the rear, a "sand blast" effect was common as the front tires threw all kinds of road debris rearward, chipping the paint of the spats. There was only one change to the spats design, in 1979, where the spats were made to blend in with the new front spoiler design.

During the era, companies offered "foilers", which mimicked the wheel spats, only turned around. These were a very stylish way to add mud & stone deflectors to your car, and unlike many aftermarket add-ons, they actually looked pretty good. The rubber welting was prone to deterioration over time, actually looking quite nasty. Aftermarket companies have offered replacement welting off and on over the years and replacement spats are also in production.

The popularity of the Trams Am's wheel spats did not go unnoticed by the other manufacturers. AMC got into the game with the Hornet based AMX. Chevrolet added them to the Camaro Z28 and the Monza Spyder. At Ford, similar wheel spats were added to the 1978 "King Cobra" edition of the Mustang II. All tried to copy the look benchmarked by the Trans Am, but a copy is merely a substitute for the real thing!

When it came to interior selection, the Second Generation Trans Ams were at the forefront styling. A beautiful instrument panel, wonderful appearing seats, a variety of sound systems, and a host of luxury and convenience features abounded. This section will go over many of the interior features available on Trans Ams.